Machine Bet
A combination generated automatically from our selections, always at the best available price on every leg.
Last updated
How is this combination chosen?
The combination gathers 2 selections chosen from 42 matches with published odds. We pick the selections that maximise the joint probability inside the odds ceiling you set. You can change the number of legs, the date, the odds ceiling and the minimum probability in the controls above. Every combination is reproducible from the address of this page.
42 selections available to combine. With these selections the possible range is 2.22–4.52 odds and 19%–39% accuracy.
AI recommendation
This is the combination we selected: 2 legs at a combined price of 4.31. The choice comes from the probabilities implied in the odds published by the operators we track. The legs are listed in the order they appear on a betting slip, not by confidence.
- Leg 1CD Tepatitlan de Morelos vs CD Mineros de ZacatecasLiga de Expansão MXAway2.06at Premier BetFair probability 45.7%
- Leg 2Fujieda MYFC vs Omiya ArdijaJ.League 2Away2.09at eBetFair probability 44.5%
Fair probability is the product of the margin-free probabilities of each leg. It assumes independence — legs from different matches.
Chance of a return · As a combination
A combination has exactly two outcomes: every leg wins, or the stake is lost. The probability shown is the product of the individual probabilities, with the margin removed. There is no partial return: if one leg fails, the return is zero. Compare this figure with the same legs placed as separate bets.
- 20.3%20.3% chance of getting at least 431 Kz for every 100 Kz staked
- 79.7%79.7% chance of getting 0 Kz
A combination has two outcomes: every leg wins, or the whole stake is lost. There is no partial return — if one leg fails, the return is 0 Kz.
Partial returns only exist if you place each leg separately as its own bet instead of as a combination. That is also the form with less compounded margin.
As separate singles
These are the same selections placed separately, each as its own bet. In this form "at least one wins" is a real number, because each bet is paid on its own. The cost is the same total split across the bets, and the margin stops compounding. A single bet can return money even when the others lose.
- 69.9%69.9% chance of getting at least 206 Kz, from 200 Kz staked (100 Kz on each match)
- 30.1%30.1% chance of getting nothing back
All possible outcomes
| Outcome | Return | Chance |
|---|---|---|
| Every match wins | 415 Kz | 20.3% |
| One match wins: Fujieda MYFC | 209 Kz | 24.1% |
| One match wins: CD Tepatitlan de Morelos | 206 Kz | 25.4% |
| No match wins | 0 Kz | 30.1% |
Staking separately costs 6.4% in margin against 12.4% for the combination — the same selections, 1.9 times cheaper, because the margin stops compounding.
This is the only form in which "at least one wins" means money: each bet is paid on its own, instead of the whole amount depending on every leg.
Alternatives are ordered by potential return, highest first. A bigger return means a smaller chance and a bigger margin for the book.
A combination’s accuracy is the product of its legs’ probabilities — the chance the whole combination wins. It is the only calibrated number we publish: we do not invent a per-pick hit rate.
Total odds and accuracy are near-inverses — accuracy is the same thing seen without the bookmaker margin. So they move together: raising the minimum accuracy lowers the odds. If the available matches cannot meet one of the limits, we say which one.
Every leg uses the best price across our books, which cuts the margin by about 1.1 percentage points per leg. A real saving, but it does not make the combination profitable.
We never use two legs from the same match.
We cap it at three legs deliberately. Bookmakers promote long accumulators because the margin multiplies; we do not.
Combinations are not part of the per-pick accuracy record: a combination settles as a single unit and would distort the sample. The per-pick record is on the Performance page.